Rating: ****This is the first novel from my list of 50 Classic books that I read! It was a short, but good one that I had always meant to read, but never did.
Rating: ***This novella by Henry James was fun look at cultural expectations placed upon women, which A Portrait of a Lady, which I read earlier in 2014, explored more in depth. (This novel was also read as part of my 50 books)
Rating: ***I’m sorry. I can’t not compare this to Little Women. It’s like half as good, so 3 stars was a generous rating.
Rating: ****This short(er) novel from Gaskell was much more fun and lighthearted than North and South, the only other novel that she wrote that I have read. I enjoyed the fist person narrative about the "quiet" country town that was anything but quiet. It was full of quirky characters who had a touching dedication to helping their neighbors--no matter how silly the circumstance might be.
Rating: ***I really wish that I had read this before I read a biography of the Fitzgeralds' since it is semi-autobiographical. It was a little predictable because of that. I also wish that I had read This Side of Paradise first, since it was Fitzgerald's breakout novel. This novel was very interesting because I read it immediately following The Beautiful and Damned. The novel takes place during the Jazz Age, also, but it takes place in the UK. It dealt a lot with social classes, like The Beautiful and Damned, but it referred to World War I and the class changes a lot more than Fitzgerald. Money was discussed at length in both novels. Lady Chatterley's Lover is much more explicit with sex than The Beautiful and Damned, which danced around the topic much more. Honestly, I was completely shocked that this novel was published in the 1920's, due to the explicit nature of some of the scenes and language. Lady Chatterley's Lover does mention jazz, dancing, and bobbed hair in passing, but it more about what love, sex, and intimacy means to men and to women. Lawrence wrestles with the three (love, sex, and intimacy) to see where and if they overlap with each other, plus how men and women might view them differently! Women and aristocratic women, specifically, are held to a different standard in Lady Chatterley's Lover, as opposed to The Beautiful and Damned, where the men seem to be falling over themselves to make the American women happy.
Rating: ***I didn't love this, but I didn't hate it. It's not on my list of books to recommend to anyone, anytime soon. Honestly, I didn't find Madame Bovary very sympathetic. I know the point that the author was trying to make, but it got lost among the tedious whining and immorality of Emma (Madame Bovary). I know that social conventions were different when the novel was written and where it was written, but that doesn't change the fact that the main character was written in such a way that I really wanted her to be unhappy. While I enjoyed the novel, I hated the fact that the novel ended on a cliff hanger! You have to read the entire series to get the whole story! I couldn't bear 3 more novels of reading the tedious thoughts of the main character. He's actually kind of boring for a murderer.
I wanted to read this novel because it was the novel that gave Fitzgerald his start. Again, not my favorite book, but I can appreciate it for what it was, a portrait of the "lost generation."
Ok, I love Faulkner. Sanctuary and Absolom, Absolom are two of my favorite novels ever. This one, however, I just couldn't get into it. Maybe I'll try it again some day!
I did enjoy this novel, however it was not Middlemarch. It wasn't close. It felt like an early Thomas Hardy novel. The rural setting, unrequited love, odd/far-fetched situations, and may an attempt to make commentary on social mores and hypocrisy left me feeling like I really did just read something along the lines of The Mayor of Casterbridge (minus the the whole wife selling thing...).I definitely enjoyed it, but I guess I was looking for something either along the lines of Middlemarch or something more original than an early Hardy novel with a slightly happier (only slightly) ending. So, if you DO want more Hardy novels, read this. This novel was a reread for me! You can read all of my thoughts from a book club link up here! (Josie enjoyed it, too!)
Rating: ***Some of these stories were insanely creepy. I can see why they are included in anthologies with Poe. I also think this was my last Hardy novel (well, short stories) to read!
This was an interesting novella. I can appreciate it for what it is, but it is not at the top of my recommendation list. I honestly enjoyed the novella a little bit more in hindsight when I looked up some more information about the author and criticism of the novella. Putting it in context would have made the novella more entertaining, but I was afraid of spoiling the book! It didn't hurt that I listened to the audio version read by Collin Firth... 🙂
It took me a while to get through this book. The prose was very thick, so to speak. There were beautiful details and insight into human nature, but the French characters who spoke broken English made it harder to understand the middle part. I am glad I read the book, but I would not recommend that anyone rush to read it immediately.
Just not funny. I prefer Heyer's funny novels. All these villains and "silly" women kind of rub me the wrong way.You can read my past monthly round ups: February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 And other archived roundups here!
Also, you can find other individual book reviews, tips on saving money on Audible books, book recommendations based on genres and all things related to literature here!